As I understand it is standard to speak of one instead of we. There is not a lot of information given either. --Cethegus 23:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

In my opinion, the wes should be replaced by the passive. --Eptalon 00:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Good article voting

I believe that this article in now ready for voting for GA status. Does anyone else here agree with me about this? Razorflame 15:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


Solvation is the scientific word for dissolving something, solution is not. See en:solvation. Solution is the end result of solvation/dissolution. Piping "dissolve" to "solution" is like piping "melting" to "water". A link shouldn't be changed just to avoid having a redlink when the original word is more accurate than the change. Plus, I think we should encourage the creation of solvation. · Tygrrr... 14:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

The VGA/GA processes should encourage a search to find variants to fill redlinks (City of New York -> New York City for example) but there can never be a reason to fill in a redlink with a close matches as here. --Bärliner 15:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree. I did not know the word solvation. (My word, I don't know the language well enough.) - As dissolve existed the red link to solvation made no good sense either. --Cethegus (talk) 12:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

All drugs addictive

I am changing the statement about all drugs being addictive. As per this source: , some drugs are not addictive, such as marijuana. Kansan (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Very poor English

This article is terribly written. The information is fine, but spelling, grammar, choice of words, etc. Are embarrassing Karnotorum (talk) 12:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Doesn't seem to me to merit such a sweeping condemnation. Why not be more specific? Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC)