Its difficult to keep a balance on these issues.
What does one do with statements such as

  • Irrelevant: ‘The Apocrypha was written in the times of the exile between the period of 400 -> 0 AD, where in religious view, God had stopped sending prophets due to their disobedience.’
  • False: The majority of the Apocrypha was not written in the Native languages of the Bible, such as Hebrew or Greek
  • Speculative: Jewish sects and historical evidence may prove the apocrypha as works of the Devil and are not of God
  • Contentious: Antioch, Syria where True Christians of the Early Church had in their possession of the Holy Sciptures in manuscript format, highly disregarded manuscripts that were found corrupted in Alexandria Egypt.

--Mariner 12:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"This is fake." ???

In the first paragraph, "Some of the apocrypha were written at a later date, and were therefore not included. This is fake."

Am I missing something (totally possible) or should this be removed? Vs604 (talk) 08:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)