Ard Wiki:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2009/March/Done


I'm the same on enwiki; would like to help rollbacking here as well. -- Mentifisto 14:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
18px Done --Eptalon (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. -- Mentifisto 14:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


I have had rollback for 11 months on enWP (where I have more than 3,500 edits with no history of blocks). Mostly, I'd like to do more this weekend (such as move pages) but can't because I'm not even autoconfirmed on seWP. Hopefully my past 45 edits here (plus the thousands on enWP) show I can be trusted. EhJJ (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
18px Done--Eptalon (talk) 23:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Autoconfirmed will take some time, don't despair. As ot rollback, I have given it to you; I trust you to use it correctly. --Eptalon (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I will use this tool carefully as I'm still new to this Wikipedia and things are similar yet sufficiently different from enWP. EhJJ (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Dalibor Bosits

I have a strange feeling it would be a helpful thing in some occasions ;o)--Dalibor Bosits ©</font> 11:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
18px Done I am expected to write a witty comment here, but I don't. --Eptalon (talk) 11:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Andrew Kelly

I have rollback on the English Wikipedia (verify) and it would be useful here as well. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 05:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
{{notdone}} - Sorry, but you only have about 6 edits here. Please re-apply once you've become an active editor, as required on the main requests for rollback page. –Juliancolton (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The criteria state, "You must be an active member of Simple English Wikipedia, preferably with some experience in reverting vandalism. Admins/rollbackers from other projects can be granted rollback without these requirements" (emphasis mine). If you or another admin still don't think I should be given rollback, I will not push the point any further. Respectfully, Andrew Kelly (talk) 06:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

(<-) 18px Done, let's not make a story of it; I nevertheless expect you to use it properly. --Eptalon (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I did not mean to make a fuss or anything, I was completely willing to drop it after a second opinion. I must say, however, that I agree with your opinion. :) --Andrew Kelly (talk) 11:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
This is perfectly normal. We do not require people to make lots of pointless edits to "prove" themselves to use a tool, if they know how to use it already. It isn't difficult. Majorly talk 17:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

User:The New Mikemoral

I am requesting rollback because I think that I am allowed to have rollback here if I have rollback on the enWP. Best regards, The New ℳikemoral♪♪ 19:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Forgot; to prove I have enWP rollback rights, here is a link. Thanks, --The New ℳikemoral♪♪ 19:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
18px Done Please use as you would on enWP fr33kman talk 19:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. --The New ℳikemoral♪♪ 19:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)